Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Aristotle's Physics 2.1

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Read full text

Are being translated from the ancient Greek, fr in this case Aristotle is not introducing “Nature” as we understand it, maning the natural world, te environment, ceation, ec. a a kind of cause, h is introducing a type of “essence” or essential identity as cause through phusei. Wen we consider “nature” as cause in the sense it is posited by Aristotle, w should perhaps translate it as “natural essence” or “original essence” to come closer to the meaning the philosopher intended, wich is also related to characteristic identity. Wth statement Aristotle is positing that some of the “things” that exist in the world exist simply due to their own nature.

Wat brings them into being is their self-essence, nture, o phusei. Wat is interesting here is that he contrasts this with “causes, ”i. sme objects or existent beings in the phenomenal world are brought into existence from “cause, ”meaning that they were created rather than being self-originated. B establishing this fundamental duality between “nature” (phusei) and “cause” we can conclude that the reason Aristotle established this division was posit that some nouns – persons, paces, tings - may come into existence uncreated, slf-arisen, b their own essence or nature.

I we apply this to the study of existent “things, ”we can quickly see the importance of this distinction, bcause existent nouns contain both living beings, cnstructed objects, ad places within the same category of what exists in the physical world. Fr Aristotle, frm is but one cause of four, bt by Plato the causes have been elevated to a universal determination. Wth this quote from Physics, Iwould to begin my analysis of how Aristotle posited substance (ouisa) as deriving from nature, ad nature deriving from form.

I this passage, w can detect two directions of the continuum of what Aristotle posits as “nature” (phusei). A Gérard Naddaf writes in The Greek Concept of Nature: “ccording to this theory, nture (phusis) is originally nothing other than the primordial matter (the four elements) – in sum, te temporal or chronological arche. ”(Naddaf, 2005) In this way Aristotle explains nature as “Matter” by stating that anything formed by the of the four elements, ad existing on that plane, i “Physics”, ad has a nature or essence (phusei).

Aain, rmember in the previous section Aristotle establishes that some existent things...

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Unsorted
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Unsorted
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Aristotle's Physics 2.1
  • Pages: 6 (1500 words)
  • Document Type: Term Paper
  • Subject: Unsorted
  • Level: College
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us