Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Analyzing argement

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

In addition, bth authors use anecdotal evidence as proof for their arguments. Fr instance, Mncken says he has not heard any executioner who is complaining of his job and instead, h has “known many who delighted in their ancient art, ad practiced it proudly” (1). B saying ancient art, h is underlining the proud tradition behind death penalty. Qindlen also uses anecdotal evidence when she says that the justice system is flexible enough where people who could get the death penalty can easily get a lighter sentence (451. Se examples that support her claim that death penalty is useless as a crime deterrent.

Aditionally, bth authors use hypothetical evidence. Mncken uses the imaginary example of B who steals $700 from A (1), wile Quindlen provides the likely example of throwing a man from a high-rise building because he did the same to a child (451. Tese are hypothetical evidence that present personal ideas using possible real-world events. Aart from using the same kinds of evidence, tese authors are similar in logos through inductive reasoning and agreement on death goals.

Mncken uses inductive reasoning by starting from what individuals feel when they get “katharsis” through death penalty and connecting that with what society gets from “katharsis” too. I his example, i A can now sleep knowing that B is punished, te same goes for society that experiences a restoration of peace of mind through death penalty for “until they are brought to book that unhappiness continues; wen the law has been executed upon them there is a sigh of relief. I other words, tere is katharsis” (Mencken 2).

believes that what one individual feels as “katharsis” is also applicable to the entire society. Qindlen also reasons using inductive reasoning. Fom the example of throwing a killer out that cannot be done because a “civilized society” would not allow it, se asserts that society cannot also get justice through death penalty that will never equal to the terror of the crime done to the victims and their families (451. Se notes that from an individual and family standpoint, teir sense of justice cannot be attained through death penalty s society cannot either.

I addition, te authors are similar in agreeing that death penalty does not deter crime. Mncken argues that society creates a...

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: English, Humanitarian, Biographies
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: English, Literature, Creative Writing
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Analyzing argement
  • Pages: 5 (1250 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: English
  • Level: Masters
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us