This move showed that the U. government was keen in ensuring that the behavior of its citizens is manned while ensuring their protection against harm. The extent to which the United States agencies treat citizens unfairly or engage in arbitrary or unjustified policies varies. The standard administrative law model is applicable to decision-making in the agencies. This is an indication that the adjudicatory decisions are supposed to be based on evidence, which is substantial, and the records must support the rules. The adjudicatory decisions should not be capricious or arbitrary as seen in many cases. It is vital to note that the agencies possess a distinctively executive (Harter, McKee, Popper, and Varona, 2010). Before the issue of regulations, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has the chance to assess the regulations from all the executive agencies to decide if the rules are constant with the Presidential policies and if the rules offered are more beneficial, that is, they do not incur much cost (Harter, McKee, Popper, and Varona, 2010). On the other hand, the administrative laws seek to minimize the tendency towards unfairness and arbitrariness in a bureaucratic government. Role in Checking the Power of the U.S. Government Administrative Agencies.
Carper, D. L., McKinsey, J. A., & West, B. W. (2008). Understanding the law. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Carter, L. H., & Harrington, C. B. (2009). Administrative law and politics: Cases and comments. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Evans, C., Freedman, J., & Krever, R. (2011). The delicate balance tax discretion and the rule of law. Amsterdam: IBFD.
Goodnow, F. J. (2003). The principles of the administrative law of the United States (1905). New York, NY: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
Harter, P. J., McKee, G. M., Popper, A. F., & Varona, A. E. (2010). Administrative law: A contemporary approach. New York, NY: West.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples