For example, Hamilton states that the contemporary Australians tend to be more affluent as far as their possessions are concerned. Then he goes on to support this premise by presenting the historical data, which amply proves that the premises of Australian masses are more spacious and well equipped then those of their predecessors. In this context, Hamilton definitely intends to elaborate on the repercussions of Affluenza, as John de Graff does in his book ‘Affluenza’. He comes down on materialism in the same vein as Tim Kasser does in his book ‘The High Price of Materialism’. Hamilton also quotes data gathered from the Australian gadgets markets to reveal how the market forces play on the discontent of the Australians to make them buy modern gadgets and accessories.The most obvious weakness of this article is that though Hamilton presents ample data, he mostly tries to interpret the factual evidence in the light of his personal beliefs and intentions. Hamilton seems to be biased in his interpretations of data as Less does in the article ‘Are we all Suffering from Affluenza?’ He seems to be bent on using the available data to detest consumption as Suzie does in the article ‘Affluenza: Is there a Cure?’ For example, Hamilton says that a majority of the Australians believe that they do not afford to buy everything they need and supports this conclusion with the results of the Newspoll survey. In the next. Affluenza: The new illness in Australia.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples