It is perhaps one of the most widely referenced theories in the discourse over nationalism today. I the introduction to his discourse on “imagined community, ”Anderson cited several points of view in regard to the definition of nationalism that led him to admit that “nation, ntionality, ntionalism – all have proved notoriously difficult to define. 3 As a tentative suggestion he considered the concept as a cultural artefact that was the “spontaneous distillation of a complex ‘crossing’ of discrete historical forces… capable of being transplanted with varying degrees of consciousness to a great variety of social terrains.
4 He called the previous difficulty in defining nationalism as an anomaly and that his answer for it was the idea of “imagined community. ”He proposed that a nation is “an imagined political community – and imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign. A Anderson sees it, te nation is an imagined political community in the sense that, te sheer number of people that constitutes a nation where no one can possibly know everyone, ech person still feels a sense of with them.
Fom this perspective, ntionalism is more than an ethnic affinity and that the relationship that connects everyone are not personalist ones. Tis is the reason why Anderson does not believe that nationalism will meet its demise in the near future. Acording to Joanne Finkelstein and Susan Goodwin (2005), te discussion on the so-called imagined community is important for demonstrating that national populations do not necessarily have particular shared characteristics but a perception exist that there are sameness and there are those who are excluded from such affinity. Using the concept of imagined community, Fnkelstein and Goodwin, otlined that postcolonial nations even attempted to create national identities and nationalism by: 1 by specifying a national language; 2 writing a national history; ad, 3 emphasizing national monuments and national icons.
142) Here, te community is created or strengthened by homogenizing a diverse population, pssibly one that is consisted by different ethnic groups, b excluding or obscuring other identities. Iwould like to quote Marc Redfield (1999) in trying to dissect the proposition that there still no end to nationalism the immediate future. Tis is his analogy about nationalism in the circumstance of a.. .
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples