However, with the Obama administration’s change in policy, they will get the opportunity to discover their full potential as future doctors, teachers, and entrepreneurs, among other professions, who would greatly benefit the American economy. According to the “Congressional Record” (1026) proponents of the DREAM Act state that it would contribute to the military’s enrollment efforts and preparedness because it would expand the recruiting group to the benefit of the American military. Furthermore, it would make America more competitive in the global economy because the young people who would be the beneficiaries of this Act would be able to live up to their fullest potential.
They would also contribute a great deal to America’s efforts to have the highest number of graduates in the globe by the year 2020, which is something very important if America is to remain in the increasingly competitive international economy. Moreover, the immigration and border security experts will be able to focus on those who pose a serious threat to the security of America because this legislation provides a firm but fair way of dealing with innocent children brought to America at a young age so that the Department of Homeland Security can dedicate more of its resources to detaining and deporting criminals and those who pose a threat to America.
It is further stated that this legislation would require the responsibility and the accountability of the young immigrants who are applying to change their status. These young people would have to meet several requirements such as: having entered the country when they were under the age of sixteen; they have to undergo a rigorous criminal background check; and being responsible for the fees to cover the costs of processing their applications. The opponents of this legislation, such as Mayorga and Picower (188) claim that it will only encourage more students to immigrate illegally and that applicants would just use it to petition on behalf of their relatives who are in their home countries.
This claim is not true because those involved in the process of naturalization will not be able to petition for their relatives until such a time as they have met all the requirements stated in the DREAM Act, and this is not a guarantee.
The opponents of this legislation further claim that it would result in the use of taxpayer’s money being use to subsidize student loans and grants for those who are registered through the DREAM Act. This claim has also been found to be untrue because those registered under this act will not be eligible for any federal funding towards their studies.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples