Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate:

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Read full text

“The pluralist holds onto the belief that a good number of ways usually lead to God. On the other hand, the inclusivist believes that many ways, primarily those in the global religions, lead to God, and finally, the particularist affirms that there is only one way to God that is through personal faith in Jesus Christ”5. Re-examining General Revelation When it comes to human know how, it is generally believed that Romans 2:14-16 (New Revised Standard Version) gives the basis for Gentiles potentially and most innately cultivating a relationship with God through “the Law that is written in their hearts. ” However, there are two significant problems with this view.

First, the notion that individuals come to know God by use the works of the Law is contrary to biblical believe (Rom. 3:20, New Revised Standard Version); and second, the witness of the Gentile ethics in this passage occurs not in the in the due course of this life but in the ultimate judgment (Rom. 2:16, New Revised Standard Version). The main idea that comes behind pure inclusivism is not that Christ, or Christ’s cross is not necessary, but that our understanding of that work of sacrifice is not necessary.

That is to say, the way of Christ’s work is necessary in an ontological nature but not an epistemological way. One can argue that this is in clear contradiction to Christ’s statement in John 17:3, New Revised Standard Version. Christ openly  says that understanding or knowledge of not only the father, but also of Christ Jesus is what ensures us our eternal life and certainly the word of Christ, God in person, has a strong bearing on the approach of God6.

It will moreover be crucial in the same context to talk about just what special and general revelation can do for the individual human estate. The idea behind this is that the paper argues the importance of restrictivism as much as it tears it down the vile ignorance of inclusivism. The importance of salvation in all ages is the death of Christ; the representation of faith in every age is God; the meaning of faith varies in the various dispensations. ” “Inclusivism is a way of balancing two truths spoken in the scripture. ”7 One of those truths is that Jesus is God’s example of making salvation to be possible; the second is that God has an urge to save all men.

Therefore, though it is God’s wish for all men to come to know who He is through Jesus Christ and to understand the potential for a relationship with Him, He is still important to accomplish salvation from Hell for those who do not follow the gospel.

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Religion and Theology, Law, Sociology
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Religion and Theology, Politics, Philosophy
Hire a Writer
preview essay on The Destiny of the Unevangelized Debate:
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us