The CDC is a state organization that does research regarding diseases and the statistics it has on smoking cessation will be of high integrity. The advantage of using archival data from the Center for Disease control is that it will provide a true reflection of the smoking prevalence in the United States. Interviews also provide one of the best sources of data because information is derived is useful in formulating a smoking cessation program. Interviews source information directly from the affected stakeholders and therefore will be highly relevant in developing the program.
Observation as a source of data collection has one major strength in its ability to bring practical information. Observations have an outcome of accuracy and fewer errors. The primary weakness of using information from the archives of the Center for disease control is that it may not be true in the present or future. Archival documents have data from research previously conducted. Since the program evaluation plan aims to create a smoking cessation program that will be used in the present and future, the relevance of the data in terms of time puts in question.
Data from records of health institutions may also have an over-reliance on the medical opinions of health professional and may not be well suited in helping to develop a smoking cessation program. Surveys also have their shortfalls, for example, data from questionnaires depend heavily on the honesty of the respondents and therefore leaving a huge margin for error. It is also time-consuming to get the questionnaires to as many respondents as possible. A lot of funds are required to distribute the questionnaires.
The main shortcoming associated with the use of interviews to be used in the program evaluation is that personnel is required to carry out the one on one interviews. Attrition is one of the threats that may face data collection in the program evaluation plan.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples