He utilized the ideas of the great Fredrick and the famous napoleon as the basis of his reference work. Basing on his work on war the book has rich historical examples used to explain various concepts about the war in Vietnam. Clausewitz developed three main objectives essential during the war1. Firstly, the objectives of the military in a war that gives a helping hand to one’ s political objective can be categorized into two divisions (Elliott 66). War to ‘ disarm’ the enemy is meant to render the enemy politically helpless or impotence of military and the war to achieve limited aims.
Secondly, war should not be seen as to be having any self-purpose. It should be viewed as an instrument of ‘ politic’ . This was a Germany phrase that constitutes the meaning of policy and politics. He emphasized that war was not merely a political scene but also a real political tool. It is a continuation of political commerce which involves carrying out the same objectives by other means. Lastly, all the other two factors being considered, the course will appear favoring the side with stronger, political and emotional motivations.
This is usually experienced with the defender side like the Americans soldiers in Vietnam. This is different from the common prejudice that those in war usually adopt during aggressive warfare. Some of the elements that he emphasized in the book and theory were the use of critical analysis techniques during the war, analysis of military dialectical approach and analyzing critically these techniques before and during the war. He stressed o the use and abuse of historical information and studies. The army should nature some military genius and balance of natural mechanism and method (Douglas 45).
The war should establish the link between the objectives of the military and the objectives of politics. He factored out the asymmetrical bond between the defense and attack should be identified. He points out that ware belongs basically to the social realm (Lomperis 173-194). He opposes the idea of war belonging to the realm of science and art. He further argues that tactics and strategy belong basically to the realm of science and the realm of art respectively.
In his theory he points out the ides of friction, identifying operational and strategic centers of gravity during the war. He later argues that the culminating point of victory and offensive to be identified. There should be a clear philosophical difference between real war and ideal war or absolute war(Pike 132).
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples