Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Legal Thought Module

This is a preview of the 8-page document
Read full text

There is need to redefine the concept of sovereignty because nation states can no longer do things just for the sake of it even if they are harmful to the well being of the rest of us. Fr instance, wen America realized that the Afghan Taliban government was supporting the Al-Qaeda, i reacted by removing it from power. Te same happened to Eretria when the UN Security Council realized that they were supplying Alshabab with weapons. Teir reaction was to pass sanctions on it because there is no way was going to allow Eretria to continue supporting terrorist groups.

Te above incidences imply that sovereignty no longer guarantees absolute protection because no country is an independent entity as we are all part of the global society. Fr instance, te world cannot allow any government to use nuclear weapons just because it is sovereign and as such its internal affairs should not be interfered with. Tis means that sovereignty will not provide security to that particular state because the other countries will intervene and stop it from going ahead such unethical undertakings.

I this era, svereignty is only functional if it does not cause harm to the other nation states and brings satisfaction to all the other parties. Aything contrary to this will only lead to external aggression in order to restore order. Tere are also other factors that may lead to the reduction or even total elimination of sovereignty, lke for instance in the case of genocide or if a state can no longer provide for its citizens. Tis was witnessed when The North Atlantic Treaty Organization decided to intervene in Serbia in order to stop ethnic cleansing and genocide.

I the cases where sovereignty was left to reign like in Rwanda and Darfur, i proved to be very costly as witnessed in the mass killings. Te above incidences clearly imply that the notion of sovereignty must be conditional, ad even contractual but not absolute. B this, i a state fails to live up to its side of the bargain by doing unlawful things then, i automatically forfeits the normal advantages of sovereignty and subjects itself attack, rmoval or even occupation if need be. ...

This is a preview of the 8-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, History, Culture
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Politics, Religion and Theology
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Legal Thought Module
  • Pages: 8 (2000 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Law
  • Level: Degree
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us