The MD is aware there was no mention of the intellectual property rights in the cursory job contract used for this employee. Some subscribers have complained that they have been approached by other organizations that appear to have information about them, which must have originated from the StudentBar. X’ who resigned over a payment and promotion row, is also demanding to see any file about him in the possession of WWW which gives reasons why he was being, in his view, blocked from promotion. There were rumors about his honesty and misappropriation of company resources. Links to adult files were recently removed despite moans from the subscribers.
It is also to be noted there is marked the absence of registered software in the premises You are also asked what sort of ‘ subscription contract’ and terms and conditions you would expect in this sort of site with a view to shielding /limiting the liability of the providers of the StudentBar. At present, there are 2 Directors who discuss all issues at a weekly meeting and then allocate responsibility according to workload.
(They both project lead/design code). They employ 3 full-time programmers and the occasional contractor according to deadline /workload. Analysis of the case showed in StudentBar there are issues of copyright infringement -in the students swapping music, graphic files. Streaming media, linking framing, deep linking all these pose problems to’ fair deal ‘ practice. An Internet service provider is also legally involved in this by providing necessary software thus creating a congenial environment. Gossiping about the Lecturers and colleagues can raise issues of defamation. Defamation Act 1996 imposes liability for libel and slander (untrue statements which damage someone’ s reputation)1, In this case, Lecturer’ s demanded the removal of material and archives and ISP having come to know of the problem should have responded quickly, otherwise Art.
14, Directive of 2000/31 states that ISP is liable for a court injunction order. The issue of sharing of old assignment solutions is not legally binding since it is not copyrighted material and once it is the old one. Another problem is of’ X.’ .He was misusing personal data of subscribers – a violation of the Data Protection Act, 1998 can be invoked.
Since the contract of X did not mention IPR, his taking of the code he developed while at work, has no legal binding showing the importance of proper contract and terms and conditions for employees.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples