Facebook Pixel Code

Individual Research Task

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Read full text

Basing on the accusation, the Revolutionary united front, plus the Armed forces revolutionary council shared a general sketch and reason. Therefore, forming a combined scandalous endeavor which consisted in execution, together with Taylor, the combined events essential to add and work out political authority and be in charge of the land of their neighbors Sierra Leone, and in particular over the areas with diamond mines. His trial commenced on 4th June 2007 and he was given a 50 years sentence. His defense team unsuccessfully filed a petition against his sentence. Taylor had earlier shown opposition against his accusations as well as the arrest warrant given against him by ICC claiming that, as a Head of State, during the time the condemnation and the arrest warrant were given, he had the right of being immune against judgment.

Taylor lamented that he was denied his right for fair trial. His defense also claimed that United Nations experts in Liberia denied them a chance to present a report. The case was to determine whether Taylor was responsible for all claims against him.

The court ruled basing on the 20 witnesses that gave their testimonies against him. His state of health was also put in consideration to ensure that he was at good health condition both mentally and physically. His health was good for him to continue with his trial. The witnesses against Mr. Taylor gave substantial evidence according to the ruling chambers there was clear evidence that he was involved in the accusations majorly war and crime against humanity.

He was therefore detained and was to serve as an example to other African presidents. The required legal procedures should be followed in such cases at the ICC. In this case, the trial chamber postponed the case severally to give enough time for Taylor and his defense team to prepare for the case. The trial chamber was also given enough time to analyze the evidence issued before passing their judgment (JIMD, 2012). The right to receive mental health treatment Clinton vs.

Anderson at Supreme Court Clinton was arrested on 23 August 1982 for breaching the agreement they signed with Anderson, his business partner. The Supreme Court suspended his trial because it was confirmed that he was incompetent to be tried because of his mental health. The psychiatric examinations had proved that he was not fit to be tried and as such, he should be given his right to receive mental health treatment before being tried.

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Open full text

Related Topics

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Psychology, Social science, Politics
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Psychology, Media, History
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Individual Research Task
  • Pages: 6 (1500 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Psychology
  • Level: Undergraduate
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us