Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

The goal of this assignment is to analyze a situation in which there are at least two differing perspectives on the appropriate use or meaning of a particular space in or around the GTA

This is a preview of the 7-page document
Read full text

Initially an argument broke out between the two and bitter words were exchanged. Both the cyclist and the pedestrian believed that the mistake was not theirs. The pedestrian thought that the cyclist was on the wrong while the cyclist thought that it was the fault of the pedestrian. Other bystanders were forced to intervene and calm the fuming pair. Another bystander indicated that both the cyclist and the pedestrian were on the wrong. The police were not called in as the problem was solved by the bystanders. Others blamed the new design for the problem despite the road being divided into distinct section for pedestrians and cyclists.

A police constable who saw the video clip of the brawl during the incident confirmed that no charges were laid (King, 2015). However, he also indicated that the users are to blame for such conflicts and it has nothing to do with the new road. The space is quite significant to both the cyclists and the pedestrians. In Canada more people are increasingly using the bicycles when traveling for short distances (Haworth, Schramm, & Debnath, 2014).

Other wall for short distances and this has been brought about by the health considerations. The road was therefore designed to accommodate both the pedestrians and the cyclist. Other pedestrians also use the road while taking their dogs for a walk. As a result of this, the road is usually busy and full of pedestrians and cyclists. The road has been marked clearly indicating where the pedestrians and the cyclists should pass through. No physical barriers are in place to prevent the pedestrians from walking on the same lane with the cyclists.

Due to the high volume of traffic, the pedestrians would at time walk at any lane including at that of the cyclists and the same is also applicable among the cyclists. While crossing the street, the pedestrians will also have to cross the lane that belongs to the cyclists. This is also applicable for the cyclists whenever they are crossing the road. Although there are street signs in place including traffic lights, it is at times difficult for both parties to use them. The public space is thus important to all the users as it enables them to reach their destinations (Haworth, Schramm, & Debnath, 2014).

The users have to interact from time to time as both parties require the roads. The users have to share the public space but each party has diverse opinions with regards to its use. The cyclists are of the

This is a preview of the 7-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Geography, Formal science & Physical science, Logic & Programming
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Geography, Mathematics, Environmental Studies
Hire a Writer
preview essay on The goal of this assignment is to analyze a situation in which there are at least two differing perspectives on the appropriate use or meaning of a particular space in or around the GTA
  • Pages: 7 (1750 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Geography
  • Level: Ph.D.
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us