In most cases where regimes fail to meet the expectations of its people, several actors intervene with the intent of helping to solve the conflict. In this regard, both non-state actors and the international community plays a critical role in restoring stability in such countries. However, although the intended goal of such interventions is for a good course, there are several issues that must be looked at to ensure there is the absence of conflict between the citizens and the government in place. First, it is correct to argue that international involvement is indispensable when the situation goes beyond the country’ s capability to restore normalcy.
However, sovereign states would always find it necessary to solve their conflicts internally. The argument can be based on the fact that the international community cannot always be there to help the country run its affairs. For instance, it is apparent that most of the conflicts that face many nations revolve around the running of the government and bad governance. Therefore, even if the international community can intervene and help the country solve its problems, the bus stops with the people of the country.
This means that, for example, if it is bad governance that creates the conflicts, it is therefore only the people of that particular country that can solve the problem by enacting or changing the constitution in order to put an end to such conflicts. Second, the international community can only intervene to help solve problems related to highly ranked personalities or institutions, but cannot get down to the grassroots to help the communities. For instance, in the case of Mali, even though the international community helped in reinstating the overthrown regime, it is evident that there is continued conflict among different groups with different interests.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples