The evaluation is due to that of community members, which god is not. His approach to reasoning is also incorporated in the review, in considering that the interactions and processes of human s are head towards needs and purpose. Since God has no desire to accomplish anything encapsulate in the concept of human community acceptance, thus what is considered moral. As such morality is a constraint f society, meaning t is limited by time, as well as humanity itself. Davies states that in the bible, God is rarely described as being moral (Davies 117).
His attributes range from faithfulness, righteousness, just, merciful, and loving. Despite being describes as such, God ascribes to agreed greater than that of humanity itself. Nob putting God is the constructs of humanity defies his position, and he should be accorded the same preferences with regards to moral ideals. There is an obvious disconnect between the morality of god and that of humanity. Considering his actions in the bible, it may be argued that God is a partisan entity. Testimonies of Christianity indicate that ceremonies are part of human and God interaction, and the decisions that influence the actions taken up God cannot explained in human terms.
It is the description that the bible and Davies provides that challenges the assertion of a god who is moral (Davies 209). With respect to the concept of Aquinas, god is considered generally good, and factual, such that there exists no room for verify. The existence of extents in the creations of God further contradicts the concept of good morality in human interactions. Although god is seen as having no moral criticism, he shows love towards humanity.
Davies argues that love is the will to do well, which spins the idea of God being a protector to humanity and the human condition (Davies 122). Love, which is said to conquer all, is an entry point that can be exploited in determine the existence of god, and it is via this approach that God is associated with emotion and thus the realization of whether goodness, in the context of God, represents morality. Under the argument of love, the question that seems to stand out as whether the acts of God are normal since they have the interest of people at hart.
This attribute is similar to other attributes that God gives the humans. Davies concludes his arguments by looking at the concept of God in a time-space continuum and the definition derived from religion (Davies 122). The context of the bible and god being the same over and over again while related to the cause-effect chain indicates that God does not share the doubt and associated with past experience failure as well as the chance of failure in the choices of human-God and human-human interaction.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples