Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Analysis of Escobar's thesis compare and contrast his theological contribution

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

Moltmann focuses on four lines of thought, which include the notion of an eschatological open future, the Christian theology of history, the Trinitarian sending God and the scope of salvation. Moltmann believes that, the prospect of history should be kept open as the meadow of God’s puzzling and capricious works since a closed history robs hope for the future. This is because a closed history denies hope for the future (Lopez, 101). It is imperative to note that, this claim is fundamental to Missiology since it attempts to elucidate God’s plans and distinctiveness.

On the other hand, the Trinitarian Theology forms a fundamental aspect to Mission work. Moltmann asserts that, mission originates from the very being of God and not an activity of human beings. This aspect indicates that, there exists a link amid systematic theology of the Trinity and the mission work. More over, the Moltmann’s Systematic study of the nature of Christian prospect is critical because it preserves the veracity of the human familiarity of time and the certainty of God’s manifestation partaking in time while addressing the nature of God and of time.

Numerous theologians have supported Moltmann’s theology by asserting that, it is fundamental to mission theologians since it is future directed and oriented (Prahalad & Doz, 128). This theology is significant since it has enhanced understanding of God’s mission in relation to a certain amount of tension of God’s rule both now and in the future. In conclusion, the act of harmonizing personal experiences, knowledge from the social sciences and systematic theology while trying to give the Bible advantaged position is somewhat intricate. It is significant; to note that, the social sciences, which study the human condition, should provide information on the way of systematic theology through a faithful and proper interpretation of the Bible as Escobar proposes (Lopez, 103).

On the other hand, the two theologies share a common aspect of proper understanding of the scope of salvation. The hope of salvation is that humanity can live wholly, die wholly and rise wholly. In addition, the two theologians share the perception of a masterful enunciation of the necessity for the mission to be a festive duty of Christians from all corners of the world. Karl Berth’s theology is a sharp contrast from the Escobar’s perception and belief.

Berth’s theological

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Religion and Theology, Psychology, Gender & Sexual Studies
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Religion and Theology, Culture, Law
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Analysis of Escobar's thesis compare and contrast his theological contribution
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us