For instance, there so much humor in the conversation between Popov, the widow, and Smirnov. They apparently seem to get in the way of each other. Interestingly they decide to settle their scores through a duel. Popov, however, does not know how to fire her husband’ s riffle. She has no option but to seek guidance from Smirnov. In a further interesting twist, as they are just about to start the duel, Smirnov changes his mind and decides to proclaim his love for Popov. These are examples of situations that would leave any reader in laughter as they are such interesting turn of events.
Conflict is also a recurrent theme throughout the play. Luka faces the conflict of dealing with her husband’ s death. She mourns for seven months and has little regard for normal life. She has a conflict of finding another life or moving on with life without her husband. Smirnov and Luka are in constant conflict from the beginning of the play. Smirnov comes to Luka to request for his dues. Luka’ s husband had dies before settling his dues. It is has been a long time and Smirnova decides he must get his money back.
In an interesting twist, Smirnova approaches a bitter widow who is not ready to lend an ear. After through arguments, they have only an option of settling their indifferences through a duel. Though comical, the play captures different aspects of conflict. These are both internal and external conflict. Smirnov on the other side faces internal conflicts within himself. Although he wants his money and is bitter, he cannot hide his feelings from Luka.
During the duel, he is much impressed by Luka’ s beauty and boldness. He decides to proclaim his love to Luka. He takes a knee and asks for her hand in marriage. Luka, on the other hand, faces the conflict of whether to accept this proposal or turn down the offer. Anton employs different literary devices to maintain a precise and interesting play. Sarcasm is one of the notable styles that have been used throughout the play. It comes about in different shades and perspectives. It is quite an evident feature in the characters remarks.
There is a thin line between paradox and sarcasm in the play. It is nearly difficult to differentiate the two literary devices in the play. When the characters talk about their genders with insults there is evidence of both of the stylistic devices. They cannot seem to have an understanding of each other. However, in the end they both agree that they love each other. It is not quite the way the reader would expect things to end up.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples